Reducing robot malfunctions
Robots bring a myriad of benefits to the manufacturing industry, including increased flexibility and accuracy.
But what happens when they go wrong and whose fault is it?
The ever-growing number of industrial robots brings an increased risk of malfunction, which plant managers must make every effort to prevent.
Robots can malfunction because of human error, control panel problems, mechanical failures, power disruption or environmental factors.
The reason it’s so important to prevent malfunction is that robot failures can cause human injury or death and can also lead to expensive downtime.
Instead of playing the blame game, manufacturers should manage the causes to reduce the risk of robot malfunction.
Programming
To function correctly, robots require programming specific to the application and environment they are operating in.
Incorrect programming or incorrect activation of the teach pendant or control panel can lead to robot error that can leave staff at risk of injury.
The programmer must be briefed fully by management to ensure that expectations are understood and the robot is installed and set up correctly.
Contact :Sandy Lin | Email: plcinfo@mooreplc.com | WhatsApp: +86-18020776786
The human factor
All robot operators must be fully trained in the robot’s operation and maintenance.
Staff can be taught to recognise the signs of failure and their causes to reduce the risk of human error.
As robots advance, artificial intelligence and machine learning are enabling them to make independent decisions.
Connectivity via Bluetooth or the internet means that robots can communicate diagnostic information,
alerting maintenance staff when performance is suboptimal.
In future, instead of a technician discovering a fault and ordering a replacement part,
robots could self-diagnose a malfunction before any damage is caused and either order their own replacement part or alert staff to contact a reliable supplier.
So, instead of playing the robot malfunction blame game, manufacturers must manage the risks
by proactively maintaining equipment and training staff well.
|
Recommended model |
|||
|
ABB |
DI801 |
ABB |
RPBA-01 |
|
ABB |
DI802 |
ABB |
NDBU-95C |
|
ABB |
DO801 |
ABB |
RDCU-12C |
|
ABB |
PP220 |
ABB |
FENA-21 |
|
ABB |
LD800HSE |
ABB |
CI522A |
|
SIEMENS |
6SE6440-2AD31-1CA1 |
ABB |
RF615 3BHT100010R1 |
|
B&R |
X20CP1382 |
ABB |
DI620 3BHT300002R1 |
|
HIMA |
H4116 |
ABB |
AO610 3BHT300008R1 |
|
AB |
1734-IB8S |
ABB |
DO620 3BHT300009R1 |
|
SIEMENS |
6ES7323-1BL00-0AA0 |
ABB |
DP620 3BHE300016R1 |
|
AB |
1756-IF4XOF2F |
ABB |
AI620 3BHT300005R1 |
|
AB |
1734-OB8S |
ABB |
PM632 3BSE005831R1 |
|
BENTLY NEVADA |
177230-01-02-05 |
HIRSCHMANN |
RPS80EEC |
|
BENTLY NEVADA |
330851-04-000-015-10-01-05 |
Schneider |
140SAI94000S |
|
AB |
1756-CN2R/B |
Schneider |
140SAI94000S |
|
AB |
1756-PB75R |
ABB |
DSTF620 HESN119033P1 |
|
GE |
IC693CPU374 |
ABB |
DSTF610 HESN119032P1 |
|
GE |
IC693ALG220 |
AB |
2711P-RDT10C |
|
GE |
IC695PBM300-CC |
AB |
2711P-RP8A |
|
SIEMENS |
6FC5210-0DF22-2AA0 |
AB |
2711P-RDT15C |